Own your intelligence.
AI usage is growing. So is the bill. Most companies still choose models using benchmarks that have little to do with their work.
Your tasks. Your benchmark.
Public evals become targets. As labs optimize against them, leaderboard gains become harder to separate from overfitting. A higher score tells you little about whether a model can complete your company’s tasks.
We start by building private evals from your production traces. They capture the work you need done, the tools it requires, and what a successful result looks like.
Then we train a decision model to route each request to a right-sized model: one that meets your quality bar at a lower cost. Frontier models where they earn their price; smaller models where they’re enough.
The candidate pool can include open-weight models served through inference providers such as Baseten and Fireworks. Your evals determine which models belong in the mix.
A three-week pilot.
The pilot starts with a scoped set of recurring tasks, access to your traces, and an agreed definition of success.
Week one: build the evals.
Turn real tasks into a private benchmark. Test candidate models against it. Establish which models meet the quality bar, how long they take, and what each successful task costs.
Week two: build the router.
Train the decision model and connect the selected model endpoints. Test whether it chooses models that meet your quality bar across the agreed tasks.
Week three: integrate and measure.
Integrate routing into the chosen workflow. Compare routed results with your current setup on quality, latency, and cost, and identify tasks that may justify specialist fine-tuning.
You leave with
- A private task benchmark you can rerun as models change.
- A decision-model router connected to the selected workflow and model providers.
- A measured comparison with your current setup, including where routing falls short.
- A shortlist of tasks worth considering for specialist fine-tuning.
Next: smaller models trained for your work.
Routing finds the best fit among available models. Fine-tuning lets you build a better fit for work you repeat.
After the pilot, you have a task definition, an evaluation set, and a baseline to beat. Successful production trajectories can supply training examples, kept separate from the evaluation set.
That prepares you to fine-tune smaller specialist models and test whether they earn a place in the router. Fine-tuning is the next engagement; the pilot builds the foundation.
Work with us.
We’re looking for a few design partners with recurring AI workloads and production traces to learn from.
Discuss a pilot